It’s no secret that over the past several years, quality curriculum advocates have avoided talking about social studies, and not just because the subject is frequently embroiled in the culture wars. There is simply less research about what constitutes high-quality instruction in social studies and fewer comprehensive programs in this area than for ELA, math, and science.

I’m sure I don’t have to convince this audience that social studies and civics are essential for a well-rounded education. Engaging in this content helps students understand local, national, and world history and geography, analyze news stories, and develop civil tolerance – things we can all use more of right now. 

Unfortunately, the 2022 NAEP civics assessment revealed students’ knowledge of civics has declined for the first time since the assessment began over two decades ago. Fewer than half of adults can name the three branches of government. Just two in ten Americans say they trust the government to do what is right. These troubling stats suggest it’s time to move past our wariness and uncover how to advance students’ understanding of this content. 

That’s why I’m excited to highlight the Johns Hopkins Institute for Education Policy, which is leading the charge on social studies curriculum evaluation. The Institute partners with state, district, and school leaders to analyze materials through its Social Studies Knowledge Map, which evaluates curricula to understand:

• Which topics are addressed,
• The quality of the materials used to address each topic,
• Whether the materials create a coherent and rigorous learning experience for students,
• Whether the topics are sequenced in a way that helps students build knowledge across grade levels, and
• Whether the materials provide multiple perspectives on important issues.

In its initial analysis of 11 programs, the Institute found cause for both celebration and concern. The good news? Many curricula build a strong foundation in the elementary grades, and most emphasize state and local history. However, the analysis found that the curricula lack primary sources for the elementary grades, do not always provide multiple perspectives on issues, and often do not create topical coherence across units of study.

One of the best ways I can think of to improve social studies and civics materials is to bring teachers and families into this work. The National Civics Bee is a prime example of driving students’ interest in civics along with teacher and family engagement. This annual, nonpartisan competition is open to all middle school students nationwide and culminates with a live event for state finalists to vie for major prizes. 

And the Collaborative for Student Success is advancing teacher engagement in civics education through its new Civics Catalyst Fellowship in partnership with the National Network of State Teachers of the Year. This fellowship will engage teacher leaders with policy and communications training, expert convenings, and a leadership project focused on educator goals for advancing high-quality civics education. The goal is to equip teachers to identify and advocate for the tools and training necessary to advance civics education for their students, schools, and communities.

I can’t wait to learn what they teach us.