Teachers Pay Teachers. Share My Lesson. ReadWriteThink. Teachers can now peruse, buy, and sell millions of supplementary instructional materials online through widely-used platforms like these. While the sites vary in terms of traffic (56% of teachers report using Teachers Pay Teachers to plan a lesson), almost all teachers report searching the internet to find curricular resources.
There are many reasons why teachers may source materials online: to address gaps in their district-provided curriculum, in response to time constraints, or to make lessons more enjoyable and relevant to students. When I was teaching, I used a combination of “borrowing” ideas I observed in other classrooms and my own internet-scouring, so I relate to the situation so many teachers continue to face.
But what do we know about the quality of the supplementary materials out there? A new study raises some serious concerns.
The Fordham Institute-commissioned analysis of over 300 of the most downloaded English Language Arts (ELA) materials on three of the most popular sharing platforms found that most fell short on categories like quality, alignment to standards, and diversity. Researchers from the University of Southern California used a detailed rubric informed by “experts in assessment, standards alignment, curriculum development, and ELA content” to analyze the materials and found that overall:
- 63% were “probably not worth using” or not recommended for use at all.
- 64% were weakly or not at all aligned to the standards they claimed to be.
- 86% offered no supports for teaching diverse learners.
- None offered what the reviewers considered to be extensive supports for most or all likely student groups.
So what should quality curriculum advocates and policymakers do with this information?
The Association of Supervision and Curriculum Development recommends actions like reevaluating curricular options, offering professional learning in selecting high-quality supplementary materials, and/or publishing a list of recommended supplements. EdCuration is one platform with information on curriculum supplements that offers expert reviews and validation of effectiveness. In North Carolina, the Department of Public Instruction has created resources to support educators as they develop or adopt digital learning resources. And as I’ve highlighted before, Tennessee educator survey results suggest that when a state provides strong support for a cohesive curriculum and aligned training, educators rely less on supplementary materials anyway.
Borrowing, scouring, and paying for instructional materials should not be go-to actions for educators today. As districts and states focus on quality core curricula, leaders must also consider whether and why teachers are searching for supplements – and support them with proven options for helping students grow.